From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: toml-ts-mode: first draft Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 22:38:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83y1rdsmjw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4E261A68-AB14-48A5-B19C-8981CB003F33@secure.kjonigsen.net> <86a63unfvp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83cz8pu9cr.fsf@gnu.org> <0f74be1a-8502-ce66-6101-2b3f060295c5@secure.kjonigsen.net> <83zgbtsnzk.fsf@gnu.org> <6afcd452-7ffb-27ec-aa1e-6ac1db67afbd@secure.kjonigsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34750"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, casouri@gmail.com, theo@thornhill.no To: jostein@kjonigsen.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 11 21:39:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p4T6O-0008pq-Kd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:39:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4T62-0003FV-5Y; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 15:38:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4T5x-0003Ed-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 15:38:46 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4T5x-0003iz-8r; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 15:38:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=cUi4R+hH8lHu4Q7NgKPE51C4ufS5wiEIMTFM+CcVWTw=; b=psZPXXJwDzF1slRY2s3F vfo3oda4n40iLCGylkzCF/KR+EsC2hfJSTCotDmeozc3nEXSsWNAZy3UIVlrma6POcXGckdDcF3qI B/LeJiPr8nwq/Cf63JyGAZ5XWjCg5ZGDrdbkI6/U7vb4brGRrkzrtppte++hAk+63+Pzpd31s0mWB z8J3nY/nuUgDf+lGBjHsHsShwV7z+Xi3uYy49T0yzM6MJiSVZbtkmuEDlgNcZdpz3Q8qUGVcWmqa7 bRthBs7D9yhJH3ImuS6Zek42qkGmtnyDDrYW+x3N+iujMwr14fY4OpD20JSF6vOQ9baQwDpAnVkzo NZKxcSpOvZXz9w==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4T5w-0001ES-RU; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 15:38:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6afcd452-7ffb-27ec-aa1e-6ac1db67afbd@secure.kjonigsen.net> (message from Jostein =?utf-8?Q?Kj=C3=B8nigsen?= on Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:31:30 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301168 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:31:30 +0100 > Cc: juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, casouri@gmail.com, theo@thornhill.no > From: Jostein Kjønigsen > > Just to have a clear sense of priorities, is imenu-support considered a > "must have" for merging, or just a "nice to have"? It's nice to have. > And are there any chance to get this included in the emacs-29 branch > if merged? That's the intent, yes.