From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: base Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:13:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83wrrfmljv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20100822120642.GA1794@muc.de> <87bp8uzu9d.fsf@mithlond.arda> <871v9o7dmf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wrrg5rzg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87r5ho5gyr.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87hbij6hib.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k4nf7ezq.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <878w3v7dd2.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282705964 3944 80.91.229.12 (25 Aug 2010 03:12:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 05:12:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oo6Pn-0005yz-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:12:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oo6Pm-0002i1-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:12:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57982 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oo6Pe-0002gx-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:12:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oo6Pd-0007Ep-0n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:44594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oo6Pc-0007Ed-PI; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:12:28 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L7O00J00U44X900@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:11:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.215.111]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L7O00J37U79XN00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:11:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <878w3v7dd2.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129184 Archived-At: > From: Miles Bader > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:19:37 +0900 > > I think it's related to bzr being inconsistent, complicated, and > confusing, with no simple mental model for users to latch onto, and > multiple operating modes poorly stitched together (it's not really clear > what bzr wants to be; sometimes it seems like its trying to be > everything at once -- and, predictably, failing at all as a result). I think you simply don't like bzr, so you are inventing imaginary problems that are present in it, but absent in other dVCSs.