From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10393: 24.0.92; missing files in Dired Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:36:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83wr9etn88.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325237838 22775 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2011 09:37:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10393@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 30 10:37:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYtk-0004yN-OU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:37:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59865 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYtk-0001XU-8e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:37:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYtg-0001Tf-KJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:37:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYtf-0007D0-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:37:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYtf-0007Cw-GK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:37:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYwT-0005Z3-Vf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10393.132523799921360 (code B ref 10393); Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2011 09:39:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYwR-0005YR-8T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:39:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYwO-0005Y3-CI for 10393@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:39:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LX000K00FX4YS00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 10393@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:36:39 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.18.76]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LX000K8HG11QO70@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:36:38 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:40:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55303 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:49:40 -0500 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: 10393@debbugs.gnu.org > > However, if I start a new Emacs, then the file appears. > (I think it also appears if I kill the buffer and make a new one.) That is strange: typing `g' in a Dired buffer showing a complete directory does the same as reading that directory in the first time. So I guess there's some subtle issue with dired-insert-directory vs dired-readin. My suggestion is still to step with Edebug through Dired functions invoked by `g', when this problem happens.