From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9723: 24.0.50; Emacs Clipboard crash Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: <83wr82cs4h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lis391w3.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902D815F95A@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <83wr8l2y6r.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902D815FA2B@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <83mx9h2em4.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902D81606FB@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902E2FD8799@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <83obtlqabj.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902E2FD8919@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <83k448riyw.fsf@gnu.org> <81B49A9E5708D84A96259A96D480EE4902E2FD8BCA@CHC-CCR01.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM> <8362frrcmz.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2A6EB2.4090708@gmx.at> <83k445p3lg.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2AE27F.6030706@gmx.at> <83k445f0d4.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2C2622.3010807@gmx.at> <83liojenym.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2D390D.6000408@gmx.at> <834nv6el9o.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2D4815.9060600@gmx.at> <8339aqehgb.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2D69C9.3000304@gmx.at> <83zkcycx13.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2D70A9.1040909@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328383949 19917 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2012 19:32:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 19:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: josejones@expedia.com, 9723@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 04 20:32:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtlLW-0005dN-6L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:32:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58125 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtlLV-0005tV-OD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:32:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtlLT-0005tQ-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:32:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtlLS-0004X8-F6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:32:23 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtlLS-0004X4-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:32:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtlM5-0000Pj-VZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9723 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9723-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9723.13283839511553 (code B ref 9723); Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2012 19:32:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54587 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtlLb-0000Oz-FZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:32:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:34969) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtlLY-0000Om-PU for 9723@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:32:29 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYV00700VJFRG00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 9723@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:31:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.218.68]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYV00707VKTL290@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:31:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4F2D70A9.1040909@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56489 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:53:45 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: josejones@expedia.com, 9723@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> But in change_frame_size_1 we use "this value" to adjust the sizes of > >> Emacs windows. > > > > Of course: if the frame's size changes, the sizes of its windows need > > to be adjusted. Since you surely understand that, I wonder what am I > > missing here. > > What I'm missing is just one thing: Where and why do we need the > non-total (no fringes, no scrollbars aka text portion) size of a frame? Never?