From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11566: 24.0.97; `read-from-minibuffer': focus to standalone minibuffer frame? Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 23:20:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83wr3u20zs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6A40227DCFBF427491B710A473E45744@us.oracle.com> <4FC22A8D.6040801@gmx.at> <8D43F91B0096402A9BCA59FE13513358@us.oracle.com> <4FC49A24.7000403@gmx.at> <83aa0r2dy8.fsf@gnu.org> <83zk8r0wan.fsf@gnu.org> <47A37270DECE4F1090B3C600AD3EA768@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338322858 7842 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2012 20:20:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 20:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11566@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 29 22:20:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SZSuO-0003JR-VE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 22:20:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35427 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZSuO-0004nS-LZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 16:20:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47387) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZSuH-0004mI-4w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 16:20:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZSuD-0003yc-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 16:20:40 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZSuD-0003yS-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 16:20:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZSvZ-00084V-Rf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 16:22:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 20:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11566 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11566-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11566.133832289730995 (code B ref 11566); Tue, 29 May 2012 20:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11566) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2012 20:21:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZSvA-00083r-Jh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 16:21:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:38185) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZSv7-00083d-At for 11566@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 16:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M4S00500W797400@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 11566@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 23:20:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M4S004TJWHCQVB0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 29 May 2012 23:20:00 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <47A37270DECE4F1090B3C600AD3EA768@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60482 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: , <11566@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:15:26 -0700 > > When `dired-mark-pop-up' calls `dired-pop-to-buffer' (inside a > `save-window-excursion', a new frame is created (to show the *Marked Files*). > > The new frame gets the input focus, and its border is highlighted. Can't tell > about the stacking order, since my standalone minibuffer frame does not overlap > it. This part is clear, but would it be possible for you to arrange the windows so that the stacking order is also apparent? > Then when `dired-mark-pop-up' calls `read-from-minibuffer' immediately > thereafter, the input focus remains where it was, and likewise the border > highlighting. I understand that read-from-minibuffer pops up a minibuffer frame, or at least it should. Does that frame become the topmost in the stacking order after read-from-minibuffer is called, or does it stay below other windows, like it was before the call to read-from-minibuffer? Thanks.