From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12801: 24.3.50; `scroll-conservatively' and `scroll-step' Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:03:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83wqy02ahp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837gq04sdr.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352138653 2089 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2012 18:04:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12801-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: dmoncayo@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 05 19:04:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TVR24-0004Ox-Uh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:04:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVR1v-0006g2-FM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:04:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36198) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVR1o-0006f1-Kt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:04:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVR1g-0000Jp-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:04:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVR1g-0000Jd-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:03:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVR4g-0000m6-5J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:07:02 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 12801 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 12801@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 12801-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D12801.13521387942942 (code D ref 12801); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12801-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 18:06:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVR4D-0000lO-ET for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:06:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:59048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVR49-0000lF-Vn for 12801-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:06:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MD1009000NG9000@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 12801-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:03:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MD1009MR0TJ3E80@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:03:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <837gq04sdr.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66488 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 05:53:52 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 12801@debbugs.gnu.org > > So the code works as intended. The documentation is not wrong, as it > describes scroll-conservatively before scroll-step, and the > description quite naturally should lead one to the above conclusion, > because these two variables contradict each other. I will make the > documentation more clear on this, though. Done in revision 110785 on the emacs-24 branch.