From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: filenotify.el Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:14:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83wqpigd84.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d2ra9z4x.fsf@gmx.de> <1383316.4Bc292dOgY@descartes> <87vc52yq04.fsf@gmx.de> <83zjuegfot.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3liyoqq.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372191263 17422 80.91.229.3 (25 Jun 2013 20:14:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ruediger@c-plusplus.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 25 22:14:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZd9-0004WE-7z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:14:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZd8-0000Ai-Pi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:14:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZd6-0000AX-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:14:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZd4-0003GA-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:14:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:34304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZd4-0003Fy-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:14:18 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOY00000TEE7I00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:14:12 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOY000PPTJN7910@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:14:12 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87k3liyoqq.fsf@gmx.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161048 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: ruediger@c-plusplus.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:27:57 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > w32notify produces 2 events for a file that was renamed: a > > 'renamed-from' event, followed by a 'renamed-to' event. > > Is there a guarantee, that `renamed-to' will always follow > `renamed-from'? No other event in between? > > How long shall we wait, until we give up, and show 'renamed-from' as > `deleted'? Events could be lost. I'd say, if the very next event is not renamed-to, stop waiting.