From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15899: 24.3.50; regression: `region' overlay is lower priority than default Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:49:32 +0200 Message-ID: <83wqk8hgtf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20137354-f982-4314-9c09-21a5fbc36557@default> <83ob5mi02j.fsf@gnu.org> <83bo1liv80.fsf@gnu.org> <87mwl58yvc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834n7dipnq.fsf@gnu.org> <5286A1AD.1080106@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384591809 25236 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2013 08:50:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15899@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 16 09:50:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vhba2-0005ck-H5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 09:50:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35141 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vhba2-0006gI-2o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 03:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51541) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhbZv-0006ea-Dm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 03:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhbZq-0005yi-IW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 03:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhbZq-0005yP-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 03:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhbZq-0007ZR-3L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 03:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15899 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15899-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15899.138459179529084 (code B ref 15899); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15899) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2013 08:49:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56619 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhbZi-0007Yz-EV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 03:49:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:39775) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhbZe-0007Yk-RN for 15899@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 03:49:52 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MWC00F00LSYKA00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 15899@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:49:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MWC00FQJLUWDP60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:49:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5286A1AD.1080106@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80630 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:35:25 +0200 > From: Dmitry Gutov > CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 15899@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 15.11.2013 18:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>>> I'm not convinced it's a bug, since this "bug" was also the fix for > >>>> another bug. > >>> > >>> Was that other bug also about priorities of faces? > >> > >> Yes. http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15618 > > > > But since the region is now an overlay, the inconsistency will be > > gone, right? > > Yes, but if the region overlay will have priority infinity, the > inconsistency will "be gone" in the opposite way from how 15618 was > resolved. But the behavior will still be consistent. And complaint about inconsistency is how I read that bug report. It even asks "which is the right behavior?", implying that having it consistent either way would be OK. > Which will make the related feature of `easy-kill' much harder (maybe > impossible) to implement. Can you tell more about this feature, and why it cares to be "more equal" than the region? (Sorry, I don't have time to read the source or try it.) Why is it important for easy-kill overlay to make region highlighting invisible? > If the region overlay will have a high but finite and documented > priority, that would be much better. Which will start an "overlay priority arms race", something I loathe.