From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14943: 24.3.50; Now just making text invisible locks the file for editing Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:21:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83wqh6vu1b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9ceffdb7-c90f-4053-ba1a-a4b4f28d86c2@default> <87d2iy2n4k.fsf@building.gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391851410 23591 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 09:23:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 09:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14943@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 10:23:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC48O-0005iy-UR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:23:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45758 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC48O-0001Td-HZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:23:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43840) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC47w-0000sS-Gh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:23:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC47q-00028j-O8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC47q-00028f-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC47q-0008Hq-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14943 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14943-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14943.139185134231790 (code B ref 14943); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 09:22:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC477-0008GY-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:22:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:52986) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC471-0008GL-N7 for 14943@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:22:15 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0O00B006N0SH00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 14943@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:21:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0O009A47BL2Y50@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:21:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87d2iy2n4k.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84921 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 21:23:55 -0800 > Cc: 14943@debbugs.gnu.org > > Yeah, adding text properties to a buffer marks it as changed (which is > correct, I guess). But is that really useful for buffers that > correspond to files? How can Emacs know whether these text properties will or won't be saved on disk? That depends on the major mode: e.g., in enhanced-text mode, they will be on disk.