From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Generating the ChangeLog files from the commit messages Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:49:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83wq6r6n6b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21606.10799.112099.788101@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1753218.Ot8JCqssfN@descartes> <546AABCF.8030705@cs.ucla.edu> <9xioico2nm.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zjbntvfz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y4r7edhx.fsf@gmx.us> <87tx1vsal4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83389f87ks.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416422995 23345 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2014 18:49:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@gnu.org, rasmus@gmx.us, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 19 19:49:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XrAK2-0007qx-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 19:49:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60190 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrAK2-0004Sx-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:49:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49285) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrAJu-0004Sg-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:49:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrAJp-0004to-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:49:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:57482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrAJj-0004sv-6s; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NFA00500UJV5D00@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:47:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NFA00LO4UVPFZ80@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:47:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177805 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 23:52:00 +0700 > From: Yuri Khan > Cc: Bastien , Rasmus , Emacs developers > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Workflow C: you receive a patch, and tell the contributor to go ahead > > and push. > > By doing so, you accept the patch as it is. The pain is when the code is OK, but the log entry isn't. In that case, instead of just letting them push by themselves, I need to do all the work for them.