From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 14:31:07 +0300
Message-ID: <83wpzz1qf8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83y4kmdjmj.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9r5670s.fsf@gnu.org>
	<555E6A15.8010404@cs.ucla.edu> <831ti957wp.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1Yvmge-0006JN-0R@tucano.isti.cnr.it> <83pp5s4uml.fsf@gnu.org>
	<555F740D.4030304@cs.ucla.edu> <837fs04egz.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87oalco1mg.fsf@igel.home> <83y4kg2yjc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<83wq002yct.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv6oo0h3.fsf@igel.home>
	<83vbfk2x9l.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnhcnym6.fsf@igel.home>
	<83pp5r3iij.fsf@gnu.org> <m2bnhbd8lv.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
	<838ucf3dh8.fsf@gnu.org> <m2382nd412.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
	<834mn339p2.fsf@gnu.org> <m2y4kfbon7.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
	<831ti7389n.fsf@gnu.org> <87oalbsgwl.fsf@igel.home>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432380693 21653 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 11:31:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 11:31:33 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 13:31:24 2015
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Yw7eF-0003Eg-ES
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 13:31:23 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37357 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Yw7eE-0007CL-VV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 07:31:22 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53014)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Yw7e8-0007C2-0o
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 07:31:19 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Yw7e1-0001Mr-9U
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 07:31:15 -0400
Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:36318)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1Yw7e1-0001ME-1i; Sat, 23 May 2015 07:31:09 -0400
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by
	a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
	<0NOS00D00VL2Z500@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>;
	Sat, 23 May 2015 14:31:06 +0300 (IDT)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0NOS00EI1VZU0300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>;
	Sat, 23 May 2015 14:31:06 +0300 (IDT)
In-reply-to: <87oalbsgwl.fsf@igel.home>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10
X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186763
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/186763>

> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: pot@gnu.org,  eggert@cs.ucla.edu,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:54:34 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Nonetheless, that's what etags attempts to compute.
> 
> That's why it fails.

It doesn't fail.