From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string> missing? Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:04:41 +0300 Message-ID: <83wpzinfhy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org> <837frjqzpk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433531120 5077 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2015 19:05:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 19:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, nandryshak@gmail.com, tsdh@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 05 21:05:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wvH-0002Am-5q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 21:04:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wvG-000704-A0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46598) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wvC-0006zo-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:04:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wv8-0003vQ-Oh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:04:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:33892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wv8-0003v9-G2; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:04:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NPH00L00J69WK00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:04:44 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NPH00MQ8JNW2V10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:04:44 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187050 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:56:14 -0400 > Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, tsdh@gnu.org, nandryshak@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > You say that this goal no longer exists, but the practice of Emacs > > maintenance tells me otherwise. We are still making optimization > > changes, some of them quite deep and pervasive ones, for very little > > benefits, like a few percents decrease in memory footprint or in CPU > > usage, even under the most favorable conditions. > > Adding string> might be 200 bytes. Saving 200 bytes is insignificant. It was also insignificant back when you decided not to include it.