From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:06:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83wpv79iel.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> <5602BE3E.1050009@yandex.ru> <5602C4DE.8020105@yandex.ru> <560B4899.2070708@yandex.ru> <83wpv8be0x.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvw4b871.fsf@gnu.org> <560BC90B.1040902@yandex.ru> <83eghgatxa.fsf@gnu.org> <560C9BB7.2070408@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443708219 15268 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 14:03:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 16:03:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZheSG-000408-Lt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:03:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50506 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZheSG-0002TD-3h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:03:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhXxW-0001bk-33 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhXxV-0003na-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:54018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhXxO-0003k5-G0; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVJ002004S9ON00@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:03:21 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVJ00J9A4XL4Q50@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:03:21 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <560C9BB7.2070408@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190542 Archived-At: > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org, stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:34:31 +0300 > > On 09/30/2015 05:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Maybe we should simply leave the locking VCSes out of this. People > > who use those back-ends have used vc-next-action for a long time, so I > > guess they won't really need vc-steal-lock. > > Well, there are not too many key bindings we can use. Being able to bind > vc-checkin to `C-x v v' instead of `vc-next-action' would be nice. AFAICS, "C-x v c" and "C-x v C" are both available, and should be good candidates for vc-checkin, I think. > IMO, it's the main argument in favor of deprecating the latter command. > > > IOW, let's make vc-checkin interactive so that it assumes the files > > are not locked by someone else. WDYT? > > Do we make a separate binding for it? Yes, I think so. It's an important VC command.