From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts? Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:22:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83wpv1xgrc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151002.073900.472512461.wl@gnu.org> <83pp0x7mnq.fsf@gnu.org> <20151004.063952.389316157.wl@gnu.org> <83zizz1590.fsf@gnu.org> <838u7i1kpn.fsf@gnu.org> <834mi526l3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444072959 4959 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2015 19:22:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley , Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 05 21:22:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBLB-0001gx-2m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:22:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47323 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBLA-0006Vn-H5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBL7-0006Vd-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBL2-0007Dk-KL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:37655) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBL2-0007DV-CC; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVR00A00HOYGM00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:22:17 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVR00APFHT3FN10@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:22:17 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190960 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:18:57 -0700 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I meant ZWJ and ZWNJ the characters, U+200C and U+200D. Or did I > > misunderstand you? > > Ah, it was I who misunderstood, Eli. I don't use these characters when typing > in Emacs, only when preparing texts in layout applications. > > The ZWNJ seems to work fine, but the ZWJ does not produce the behavior > documented here: > > http://persian.nmelrc.org/persianword/zwj.htm > > That is, ZWJ does not extend the heh into a "heh do chesm" (heh with two > eyes), it just adds space before or after the final-form (circular) heh. I tried to fix that, but I'm not sure it helped. Maybe I simply don't understand how to write entries for composition-function-table. Perhaps Handa-san could help.