all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk
Subject: Re: Calling Lisp from undo.c's record_* functions
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 05:49:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83wptg9dcd.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv8u5whvjm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
> Cc: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:52:49 -0500
> 
> > How about the following idea: we don't start the timer from
> > run_undoable_change; instead, we set a flag there that will be checked
> > by the command loop when it finishes execution of a command, and the
> > call to start the timer will be made then?  We don't really need to
> > attempt to start the timer for each and every change of every buffer,
> > do we?
> 
> That would work similarly to an idle timer, so yes, that would be OK
> (tho an idle timer would be simpler).  It suffers from the same problem
> as the idle timer: if there's no user interaction but there's continued
> process output, we'll fail to re-run the undo-auto-timer after the
> first N seconds of idleness.  Nothing too serious (it's still better
> than what we have now anyway), tho.

So we could start the timer not in the command loop, but somewhere in
the loop that waits for process output, perhaps.

But if an idle timer is fine, I think Phillip already has everyuthing
sorted out on a branch.



  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-18  3:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-16 16:46 Calling Lisp from undo.c's record_* functions Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-16 21:51 ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-16 22:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 12:14   ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 13:46     ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 14:42       ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 15:40         ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 16:24           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 16:49             ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 17:05               ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 17:34                 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 18:00                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 19:09                     ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 19:22                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 21:05                     ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 21:02               ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18  2:55                 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-18 12:26                   ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 16:35         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 20:52           ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18  3:38             ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-18  9:56               ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18 10:49                 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-18 17:30                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 16:40     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 16:51       ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-17 19:44         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-17 21:35           ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18  2:52           ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-18  3:49             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-11-18 12:31               ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-18 17:49                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-19  1:49                   ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-19 10:16                   ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-19 15:53                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-19 17:49                       ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-19 17:58                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-19 18:17                           ` Stefan Monnier
2015-11-22 21:44                       ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-22 22:41                         ` John Wiegley
2015-11-23 17:29                           ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-23  3:37                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-23 17:28                           ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-25 17:43                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-25 22:51                               ` Richard Stallman
2015-11-26 10:27                               ` Phillip Lord
2015-11-17 21:13       ` Phillip Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83wptg9dcd.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
    --cc=phillip.lord@russet.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.