From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:08:32 +0200 Message-ID: <83wpgpq0ov.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <83d1iq5ib1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3753c8j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r374wh32.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvhruyrh.fsf@gnu.org> <83r36zr75f.fsf@gnu.org> <8360oarfhs.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477843762 892 195.159.176.226 (30 Oct 2016 16:09:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 30 17:09:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0sfM-0005uH-5X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:09:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0sfO-0000XP-Rm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0ses-0000X3-Hs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:08:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0sep-0002cl-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0sep-0002ch-AX; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2460 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c0sei-0003UH-Bb; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:08:20 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 30 Oct 2016 07:33:12 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208991 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 07:33:12 -0400 > > > > It would be a lot of work for me to try that myself, and I think it is > > > not necessary if you already tried it. What fractional speedup did > > > you observe when you tried it? > > > About 20, as I wrote. > > Sorry, I am not sure what 20 means here. > Was it a speedup of 20%? > A factor of 20? A factor of 20.