From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24892: {s, }brk removed from FreeBSD 11.x and later, arm64 architecture Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:49:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83wpgcfybk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8660nzkevm.fsf@lostca.se> <82a03552-8f33-2dbe-6bb5-54f649b29db7@cs.ucla.edu> <838tsthgut.fsf@gnu.org> <60ed9038-cca2-e772-fbd3-ae31ca38e3d0@cs.ucla.edu> <834m3hgwce.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478706951 24625 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2016 15:55:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 15:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24892@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 09 16:55:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c4VDe-00033H-88 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:55:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40888 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4VDh-0006g7-C8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V8Y-0003vM-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V8U-0006a6-B1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V8U-0006a2-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V8T-0003pB-Vg; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:50:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24892 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 24892-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24892.147870657014652 (code B ref 24892); Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24892) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2016 15:49:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51095 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V7x-0003oG-Pu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:49:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38705) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V7w-0003o1-9D for 24892@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V7n-0006KW-SX for 24892@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:49:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55627) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V7n-0006KS-Pl; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:49:19 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3795 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c4V7n-0004gS-3d; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:49:19 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Wed, 9 Nov 2016 00:27:04 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125523 Archived-At: > Cc: 24892@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 00:27:04 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > would it make sense to provide a different > > implementation, which will be more useful? > > It might if someone were to write it. It would not be likely to have the same > API, though. I think we could lift the implementation from system_process_attributes, we report there the process memory size.