From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 9effa4b: Remove obsolete comments and commented code from dired-x.el Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 18:07:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83wpfejr65.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8360n1mnt2.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480954056 22351 195.159.176.226 (5 Dec 2016 16:07:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tino Calancha , Reuben Thomas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 17:07:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDvnf-0005NI-Ie for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:07:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42863 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDvnj-0007gk-A4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:07:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDvnA-0007g0-Or for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDvn7-0007iS-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDvn7-0007iO-Eg; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3280 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cDvn6-0000H9-8y; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:06:56 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Tino Calancha on Mon, 5 Dec 2016 21:33:49 +0900 (JST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210064 Archived-At: > From: Tino Calancha > Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 21:33:49 +0900 (JST) > cc: Tino Calancha , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > I questioned the need for these changes when Reuben first presented > > them. No one supported me, so I decided I was the odd one out. > > Please in the future raise your voices in such situations. > Glad to be in agreement with you Eli. > I don't see in 9effa4b reference to any bug number. I don't know where > this patch was discused. Tipically i like to read everything about > Dired. Maybe it was sent to this list with one subject that didn't catch > my eye (just guessing). This was discussed as part of bug#18716. My comment on this particular aspect was here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2016-11/msg00328.html Admittedly, the Subject of that message leaves a lot to be desired ;-) So if you only read message that catch your attention due to their Subject, I understand now how you could miss that one. (I simply read all of the messages posted to bug-gnu-emacs.) Reuben, could you please in the future keep the original Subject line assigned by the bug tracker? Thanks.