From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Null pointer dereference? Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 22:17:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83wp9l996s.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494616708 4265 195.159.176.226 (12 May 2017 19:18:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Zubin Mevawalla Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 12 21:18:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9G4w-0000ox-3M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 21:18:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55001 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9G51-0001zi-7z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 15:18:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39799) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9G4I-0001xt-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 15:17:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9G4E-0006Dp-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 15:17:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9G4E-0006Dg-PJ; Fri, 12 May 2017 15:17:34 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2516 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d9G4E-0005ts-4l; Fri, 12 May 2017 15:17:34 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Zubin Mevawalla on Fri, 12 May 2017 11:45:53 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214803 Archived-At: > From: Zubin Mevawalla > Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:45:53 -0400 > > I was curious if this was a real null pointer dereference issue, in > etags.c on line 2265? I don't think so. > `np_parent` is initialized to NULL on 2248. if `np` is not NULL and > `np->fdp == badfdp` then `np_parent->left` on line 2265 would result > in a null pointer dereference. np->fdp == badfdp cannot happen the first time the loop condition is tested, because np was initialized to point to super_root, and super_root.fdp was initialized to -1, which can never be equal to badfdp. Thanks.