From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:04:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83wp0bqjug.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6eh8u7x5be.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <87375r7f0g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default> <5C8038D7-FF85-4C42-A728-F3F85CDAC85C@permabit.com> <87efpb46sp.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <3EB0E53F-4B99-44C2-9F2E-1125A33E408B@permabit.com> <87r2rvb7c2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87po64npva.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516550668 11024 195.159.176.226 (21 Jan 2018 16:04:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 29165@debbugs.gnu.org, raeburn@permabit.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 21 17:04:23 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edI6V-0002Jm-5x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:04:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edI8V-0007Pp-Gy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edI7F-0006m8-QZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edI7C-0007U4-Ku for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:05:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edI7C-0007Tu-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edI7C-0008Pz-7P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29165 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 29165-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29165.151655069432343 (code B ref 29165); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29165) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2018 16:04:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edI74-0008Pb-5Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:04:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58991) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edI73-0008PO-4M for 29165@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:04:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edI6x-0007I7-3N for 29165@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:04:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edI6s-0007FO-MN; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:04:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2137 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1edI6p-0008Ns-9j; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:04:39 -0500 In-reply-to: <87po64npva.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (message from Noam Postavsky on Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:10:17 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142346 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:10:17 -0500 > Cc: Ken Raeburn , Andreas Schwab , > Philipp Stephani , 29165@debbugs.gnu.org, > Stefan Monnier > > I probably should have got around to this before 26.0.91, but I think > this should still go to emacs-26 because the patch makes the behaviour > closer to what was in v25. Is it important enough to justify one more pretest, after 26.0.91, and delay the release by a few more weeks? Because that's what would be needed if we install this on the release branch. Besides, this change was introduced more than a year ago, and we did that in clear understanding that it changes behavior. So "closer to Emacs 25" doesn't sound like a convincing argument in this case, because we gave up that similarity up front. Your call.