From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35695: 27.0.50; Faces diff-added and diff-removed look the same in a 256 color terminal Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 08:39:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83woiwb58x.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="161435"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35695@debbugs.gnu.org To: Anders Lindgren Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 12 07:41:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhEa-000fsn-UL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 07:41:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39075 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhEZ-0005zL-On for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:41:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50433) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhEQ-0005zC-7R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:41:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhEO-0006F7-A5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhEN-0006Ev-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhEM-0003dU-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:41:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 05:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35695 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35695-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35695.155763962613911 (code B ref 35695); Sun, 12 May 2019 05:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35695) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2019 05:40:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhDm-0003cI-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35956) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhDk-0003bv-8c for 35695@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:40:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhDf-0005X4-3M; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:40:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4990 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hPhDe-0002XE-Ek; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:40:18 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Anders Lindgren on Sun, 12 May 2019 07:03:41 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159116 Archived-At: > From: Anders Lindgren > Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 07:03:41 +0200 > > In Emac 26, they were defined using #ddffdd and #ffdddd, respectively, which is rendered fine in the terminal > (on both Emacs 26 and 27). > > One way to solve this is to add alternative color definitions using the "min-colors" requirement. Another is to go > back to the old values. I think we should go to the back values when min-colors is 256 or less.