From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35739: Bad signature from GNU ELPA Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:03:10 +0300 Message-ID: <83woir92vl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mujog0ao.fsf@gmail.com> <835zqca15y.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="1414"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, 35739@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 15 17:05:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvT2-0000AE-Ol for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:05:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38352 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvT1-0006l1-OB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:05:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvRv-00067P-4J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvRq-000093-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39627) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvRq-00008j-9o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvRp-0007KV-Q6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 15:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35739 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35739-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35739.155793261728143 (code B ref 35739); Wed, 15 May 2019 15:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2019 15:03:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53171 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvRQ-0007Jq-Kj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvRL-0007Ja-P2 for 35739@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvRE-0007z5-Mh; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3023 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hQvRC-0001RK-GL; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:03:23 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 15 May 2019 10:03:57 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159344 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 35739@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky > Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 10:03:57 -0400 > > That actually looks very good [it would also need to change the other > url-insert-file-contents in that macro, of course]. > > Eli, do you think this could also be a fix for bug#34909? > > E.g. something like the patch below? I don't know. I don't yet have a handle on what happens here, and therefore I don't understand how replacing url-insert-buffer-contents with url-insert should fix that. I'm probably missing something.