From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36370: 27.0.50; XFIXNAT called on negative numbers Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:37:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83woh7i1y8.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="269361"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36370@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 27 15:38:29 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUbd-0017us-AB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:38:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUbb-0001qF-Ux for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:38:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUbS-0001pY-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUbH-0003yI-Ah for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUbB-0003w8-S5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUbB-0000hN-P6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36370 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36370-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36370.15616426802678 (code B ref 36370); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36370) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2019 13:38:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37680 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUbA-0000h7-HH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59535) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUb9-0000gt-IZ for 36370@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:37:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUb4-0003tE-DA; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:37:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4913 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hgUb0-0003ft-HW; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:37:51 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Pip Cet on Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:17:46 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161588 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:17:46 +0000 > Cc: 36370@debbugs.gnu.org > > Do DOS machines have enough memory to run Emacs with debugging > enabled? :-) Yes.