From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32728: bug#32729: Xemacs 23 times as fast as GNU Emacs Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:00:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83woctwbqu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871rviobu2.fsf@gnus.org> <83imouo1jp.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2xplufp.fsf@gnus.org> <83r23hkqr3.fsf@gnu.org> <87k198bkrf.fsf@gnus.org> <834l0clbzt.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23fiu66.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="95877"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: layer@franz.com, larsi@gnus.org, 32729@debbugs.gnu.org, 32728@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Benninghofen\, Benjamin Dr." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 25 09:17:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtqZ-000OkL-GX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:17:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56630 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtqX-000504-Be for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:17:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38703) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtaw-0004qL-IE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:01:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtar-0001Cz-Nt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtao-0001Bf-FY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtao-0003kg-CK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32728 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 32728-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32728.157198684814387 (code B ref 32728); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32728) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2019 07:00:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37195 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtaa-0003jy-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtaY-0003je-HO; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtaS-00011r-Vb; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:00:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2992 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iNtaS-0003p6-33; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:00:40 -0400 In-reply-to: (benjamin.benninghofen@airbus.com) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170150 Archived-At: > From: "Benninghofen, Benjamin Dr." > CC: "layer@franz.com" , "32729@debbugs.gnu.org" > <32729@debbugs.gnu.org>, "32728@debbugs.gnu.org" <32728@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:38:16 +0000 > > For me your discussion about the performance problem appears very theoretical. I don't think it was theoretical. It was an attempt to identify which factor(s) affect(s) this issue, so that further investigation could be more focused. > Why do you not just compare the relevant GNU Emacs Source Code with the Xemacs Source Code? Did you try doing that? Every time I did I found that the code is so different that any comparison is very hard at best, and usually simply meaningless.