From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master d57bb0c: Treat passed strings as raw-text when percent-escaping in epg Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:45:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83wob18s5f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20191212073737.19923.49084@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20191212073738.9C7A3200E3@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="210781"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 12 16:45:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ifQeT-000sdH-1W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:45:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33280 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ifQeR-0007Yk-H8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:45:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ifQeM-0007Yc-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:45:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39298) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ifQeL-0004Dr-Rx; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:45:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4145 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ifQeK-00063P-4k; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:45:09 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:30:12 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243325 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:30:12 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Actually, Iʼm wrong here. (encode-coding-string string 'utf-8) will > work as well, Iʼd wrongly assumed it would produce a multibyte string. The question is not what will or won't work, the question is what is better, I think. And I don't think Stefan explained his rationale for preferring UTF-8.