From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 05:28:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83wo7dcbl8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4201DF24-BCC4-4C08-9857-38207B7C10B4@acm.org> <83mu8bdriv.fsf@gnu.org> <68FB4EC3-3C67-4D07-8473-5FC671024515@acm.org> <834kuhecsr.fsf@gnu.org> <0C9FA58E-BFD8-4F6D-BAAE-0C9AE03F0286@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="81992"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Mattias =?utf-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 22 04:28:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jFrI9-000LFP-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 04:28:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFrI8-0000fC-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFrHe-0000Fr-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFrHe-0005q2-Mj; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4141 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jFrHd-0005ga-Dm; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:28:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0C9FA58E-BFD8-4F6D-BAAE-0C9AE03F0286@acm.org> (message from Mattias =?utf-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= on Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:37:32 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245657 Archived-At: > From: Mattias Engdegård > Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:37:32 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > 21 mars 2020 kl. 20.19 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > > > I didn't mean the user manual, I meant the ELisp manual. I don't > > agree that this command should remain undocumented, and I don't > > understand your opposition to making this more visible and more easily > > used. Having users read the C code is quite an obstacle to some. > > It's not meant for Elisp users. It's meant for those who edit regex-emacs.c. How is this different from the "Internals" chapter in the ELisp manual? > I didn't expect this amount of opposition though, so I'm just going to add the internal--regexp-bytecode function (which I expect to be fully unobjectionable). Problem solved! I meant to document the command. Please do document it. Making important functions internal solves no problem.