From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:19:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83wo70z8tc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> <20200326193128.GC14092@ACM> <86d08y4zsx.fsf@gmail.com> <83sghs7qdz.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7y63sjj.fsf@gnu.org> <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83a73w1l8y.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="123171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, rrandresf@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 31 20:19:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLUG-000VxL-SN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:19:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42718 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLUF-00067A-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:19:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLTh-0005Yx-7a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:19:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44575) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLTg-0000PD-Je; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4159 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLTZ-0007Ba-0L; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:19:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:00:25 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246142 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, rrandresf@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:00:25 +0000 > > >> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/elisp-benchmarks.html ? > > > > (Any idea why this isn't in the ELPA repository?) > > What do you mean? I think it is (as external package tho). When I checkout the ELPA repository, I don't seem to have it. Or did I miss something? > > This might be a beginning, but the issue at hand is not to benchmark > > Emacs Lisp programs, it is to benchmark Emacs commands, so we could > > make sure we don't have speed regressions. > > Yes is just a start. I think everything is in Emacs core can be > classified as elisp implementation, I would not know where to draw a > line otherwise. I said "commands", and it wasn't an accident. Those are user-visible units, so IMO we should start by having benchmarks for frequent commands.