From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40992: 27.0.90; Evaluating a function while using edebug breaks Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 10:10:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83wo5uu81f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sggkawmz.fsf@russet.org.uk> <20200501155630.GA22689@ACM> <20200501173306.GB22689@ACM> <87o8r7xgb8.fsf@gnus.org> <87sggjm3yb.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="55598"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, larsi@gnus.org, 40992@debbugs.gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 09:11:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmIo-000ENZ-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:11:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmIn-0000BR-1P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmIh-0000BH-0a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmIg-0005La-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmIg-0005Kp-6Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmIg-0007st-1b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 07:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40992 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40992-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40992.158840342230253 (code B ref 40992); Sat, 02 May 2020 07:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40992) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2020 07:10:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmI2-0007rt-El for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmI0-0007rd-QY for 40992@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmHu-0004Us-4b; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2019 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jUmHt-0002Be-HY; Sat, 02 May 2020 03:10:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sggjm3yb.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Noam Postavsky on Fri, 01 May 2020 23:05:32 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179480 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 23:05:32 -0400 > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , 40992@debbugs.gnu.org, > Phillip Lord > > > I think that sounds like a good solution on master, but the patch that > > introduced this should probably be reverted on emacs-27 -- it wasn't a > > bug fix, but a new feature, so reverting it should be safe, I think. > > I don't understand; the fix looks trivial to me (leaving out > indentation), and only touches a new function. Surely this is okay for > emacs-27? If this fixes the problem, it's okay for emacs-27. But then why did Alan say there was no easy solution?