From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42366: UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:42:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83wo2d85gs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pn8wx3k2.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <875z9xcrrk.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6z99nv3.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo2djhp2.fsf@gnus.org> <834kph9mja.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu39jg7r.fsf@gnus.org> <83zh79879h.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2mt85mp.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7804"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 42366@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: rpluim@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 05 17:43:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LZR-0001w2-NC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 17:43:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35692 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LZQ-0007Co-Lq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LZF-0007Ch-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LZF-0004Ix-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:43:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LZF-0003NN-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:43:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 15:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42366 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 42366-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42366.159664215012939 (code B ref 42366); Wed, 05 Aug 2020 15:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42366) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2020 15:42:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LYk-0003Md-9l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57004) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LYg-0003MP-V6 for 42366@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:42:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LYb-0004Fh-As; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:42:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4919 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k3LYa-0002he-JD; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:42:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83y2mt85mp.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:38:38 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184114 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:38:38 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 42366@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > > What exactly is surprising here? In a TTY frame, Emacs doesn't > control the layout: the terminal emulator does. Emacs just sends > codes to the terminal device, and that's it. To clarify: the original complaint, AFAIU, was about the display in a GUI frame, in which case the layout is entirely ours. You are now saying that the problem is on TTY frames, but there we don't control the layout at all.