From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44577: 27.1; Missing options in definition of edebug-mode in edebug.el Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:53:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnyqxy0b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1575202005.4252872.1605107085622.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1575202005.4252872.1605107085622@mail.yahoo.com> <83o8k2znzs.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0uqadf8.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5880"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44577@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, idirectscm@aim.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 12 18:54:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGnq-0001Ma-4u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:54:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44366 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGnp-0007uO-6g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:54:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGnK-0007iQ-C9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGnK-0007Iw-1i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGnJ-0001E7-VT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:54:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44577 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44577-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44577.16052036194683 (code B ref 44577); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44577) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2020 17:53:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGmx-0001DT-3k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:53:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35806) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGmr-0001D6-U3 for 44577@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:53:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGmm-00078C-6r; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3790 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kdGml-0004Va-NI; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:53:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k0uqadf8.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:54:19 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193171 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stefan Kangas , 44577@debbugs.gnu.org, > idirectscm@aim.com > Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:54:19 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I think we should remove the list from the doc string, yes. It is > > unusual for a doc string of a mode to include an exhaustive list of > > all of its customization options; in general, the feature's group > > should be enough to discover all of them. And the manual documents > > the most important ones. > > The use case here is the `?' command when edebugging, which makes the > list somewhat useful. Cannot the '?' command map over the customization group instead? It's a maintenance burden to keep that list exhaustive and up-to-date, just so '?' could show all of the options.