From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5803: 23.1.94; Using tq-enqueue in timer messes with keystroke echoing Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:49:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnxp338v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k4sulox8.fsf@engster.org> <87h7owch10.fsf@gnus.org> <834kku6f0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7oux1l8.fsf@gnus.org> <83czzh4qio.fsf@gnu.org> <834kkt4j6k.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34050"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 5803@debbugs.gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 19:51:45 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knR2W-0008jH-4m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:51:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52026 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knR2V-0002kL-6g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:51:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knR1r-0002TK-9C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knR1q-0007KK-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knR1q-00047L-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5803 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 5803-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5803.160762622415763 (code B ref 5803); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2020 18:50:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39279 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knR1E-00046B-DA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:50:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knR1C-00045v-5S for 5803@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:50:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45755) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knR14-0006t6-CG; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3823 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1knR11-0002kE-Ly; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:50:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:40:17 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195686 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 5803@debbugs.gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:40:17 -0500 > > > Then perhaps we should install that change and see what breaks? > > Since this patch mostly just removes code, I'll be delighted to install it. > Should I take this question as an actual "go ahead"? Let's wait for Lars to chime in, after he reads the past discussions on this.