From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 05:28:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnizvy5u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mtjwzwkb.fsf@gnu.org> <87r198ytog.fsf@gnus.org> <87lezfzy5h.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgnv9964.fsf@yahoo.com> <87czkrzuxh.fsf@gnus.org> <87tue38ato.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30318"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 04:29:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Ihp-0007i5-8a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 04:29:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35502 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Ihn-00068g-Iy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 22:29:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Ih1-0005RD-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 22:28:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=57520 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Ih0-0003fQ-P2; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 22:28:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=KmH1ztHlPm8AqJHG/vEA7AG9nn8F3+MAfwSdNqbc+0Y=; b=llwAXNunmQCB d22M41wSD46RajY7o8TomC1qqGs5b+lNKiYcFAEJdd2F0ETp/JEapsIidmj/degkUHE6/tBDc9gvR JHepN3zXvG6iNZZlhEFunVw3Hmt4sdoia8xYbsCWXEOpPKpyDcq5x10kSDj6tR9Wx53A5W23EVaFl FyBDchakO6Xa4Df4pupCkujxhyT/Vbxh/xUhoYCOpr2efh4Kb3coil12fc7VKK0kCFNnGd+dmnnQy OiQ8DpAANngS7CxpYuIXpRH2ZSW5D9+npkEVqYbBRne6LUIlVRbemqwXT6pEnIQXBnRWWeX5OZ2I0 FcLgxSDMCq9S0Hsm0Unwbg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4057 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Igz-0004rD-CB; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 22:28:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tue38ato.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:28:35 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284860 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:28:35 +0800 > > How much slower is async native compilation? Same as synchronous one, I guess. It's the same code, basically, it is just run in a separate executable. > Will the bootstrap timings translate cleanly to that? I don't understand: the bootstrap doesn't use async native compilation.