From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 16:15:01 +0300 Message-ID: <83wmxbcq0a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <87il90znco.fsf@yahoo.com> <1977fbef-307b-bcf4-9448-64f26916dd65@gutov.dev> <87edjozlqq.fsf@yahoo.com> <43ddad10-49dd-1c49-ebfe-51689780b315@gutov.dev> <83jztgk410.fsf@gnu.org> <83edjojx8c.fsf@gnu.org> <8734zzv7vk.fsf@localhost> <83edjjecmx.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmxbtsd4.fsf@localhost> <83bkeneb8j.fsf@gnu.org> <87ledrtqzx.fsf@localhost> <87a5u7sal0.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkento99.fsf@localhost> <871qfjs855.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wmxbs7a1.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30084"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 15:16:40 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhXL-0007ft-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:16:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhWa-0003ei-Ja; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:15:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhWF-0003Jw-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:15:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhWE-0003QK-A2; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:15:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=inUZxqkAPyTpR0g6KUc80cZjQ9hEjj7R3Z1aFn/46UE=; b=RiB23hl7puRNigZaWj42 Gw7PQ5nxN3ujrBJf7tipojLmbLrANTYgEMDk3K8FLMckF7tfVlFVILX+OY9dShcpRKZIb2zXWd/c7 lQu/Pb52PPfZRtTq2/txLYV4vP9ipNXCUjVRnYwVOK0JcUJcWUUzXNOEfy3ScZ0AUuEQGt7Wyd9ib YyHpCQJ0WnJaAUl70B6o1A7yZHhdKeJKqDtvRBdUZpzkGVkR/g0oeIdDhzaExXS/rwbtZWhHaYANr +3Aj0CM8BkZY91wpc5GcJa8suH0Gp2ZKm7osqfVnoMBZ3GwhYtJVAtGlnM5zgM7Y5s0xHdGHOzsrs oAgrXSgFRWRcNA==; In-Reply-To: <87wmxbs7a1.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:52:54 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309654 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , stefankangas@gmail.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:52:54 +0000 > > Po Lu writes: > > > Ihor Radchenko writes: > > > >> May you elaborate about thorough testing? > > > > If tarballs are released too frequently, users will never test a single > > tarball to the degree necessary for confidence to be vested in their > > reliability. Our (already desultory) testing effort will quickly fall > > into disarray, where everyone will be testing not one tarball, but one > > of many dozens. > > These tarballs will be mostly the same, as they will only differ by > bugfixes. So, testing different "bugfix" tarball versions will only risk differing via some bugs being already fixed in newer versions. The > worst-case scenario is when some bugfix introduces another bug, but > AFAIK it is already ensured that such things almost never happen. > > So, I do not think that having multiple bugfix versions around will pose > a significant problem. I think you have a very naïve view of the effect of bugfixes in Emacs. What you think doesn't happen actually happens all the time.