From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:27:30 +0200 Message-ID: <83vdfnc831.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fx6sm8yl.fsf@telefonica.net> <873a2slzrr.fsf@telefonica.net> <83ws03db8v.fsf@gnu.org> <87d41vlok4.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262283926 2856 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2009 18:25:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 31 19:25:19 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQPi2-0005hZ-Jk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:25:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51637 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQPi3-0008Tc-0l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:25:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQPhx-0008Qf-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:25:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQPhs-0008L9-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43463 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQPhs-0008Jv-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:25:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:54594) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQPhr-0001s6-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:25:07 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KVJ00H003FWG300@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:25:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.222.44]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KVJ00HXM4HS5130@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:25:04 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87d41vlok4.fsf@telefonica.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119160 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar_Fuentes > Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:06:51 +0100 >=20 > If anyone thinks that rebase it the solution for his problem, pleas= e > ask here first. So what problem was it in this case, for which rebase is a solution? Is it the case of a number of small unrelated changes that somehow accumulated in the local branch? Or is it something else? It cannot be a single coherent change, because for that, we still think the workflow described on the wiki for the quickfixes branch is the recommended way to go, right?