From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compositions and bidi display Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:41:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83vdb9wifd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3A521851-F7CC-45DB-A2ED-8348EF96D5CF@Freenet.DE> <83fx2q5w86.fsf@gnu.org> <834oj22e96.fsf@gnu.org> <837hnuys42.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxwoxo1t.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3xjxys1.fsf@gnu.org> <838w87x87a.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272609798 7719 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2010 06:43:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 30 08:43:14 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7jwO-0001KM-0g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:43:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38317 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7jwM-0005c2-S4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7jw2-0005aU-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:42:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59709 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7jvw-0005Yu-RU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:42:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7jvf-0005U4-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:50779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7jvc-0005TI-02 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L1O00900FXPS300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:41:58 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.59.39]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L1O0067RFXWMIA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:41:57 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124343 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:28:40 +0900 > > In article <838w87x87a.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > From: Stefan Monnier > > > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:49:39 -0400 > > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa > > > > > > > Btw, do we still need to support static compositions? Those are based > > > > on the `composition' text property, which are no longer supported, > > > > right? Or am I confused? > > > > > > They're not? > > > I deduced this from the fact that we removed Qcomposition and the > > associated handle_composition_prop from xdisp.c. Again, I could be > > confused. > > ??? I've never removed handle_composition_prop nor any of > codes for static composition. Sorry, I got confused.