From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6283: doc/lispref/searching.texi reference to octal code `0377' correct? Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 21:10:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83vda9md09.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274984857 8541 80.91.229.12 (27 May 2010 18:27:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6283@debbugs.gnu.org To: MON KEY Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 27 20:27:35 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhnq-00046N-Ie for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 20:27:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51998 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHhnp-0003PD-Ry for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34737 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHhni-0003It-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhnh-0007cY-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:27:26 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhnh-0007cP-Gy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhYn-0006IR-Un; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6283 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6283-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6283.127498388024190 (code B ref 6283); Thu, 27 May 2010 18:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6283) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2010 18:11:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhY7-0006I7-3Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:11:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhY5-0006I1-0w for 6283@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:11:18 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L3300M00BQDIY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 6283@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:10:40 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.111.84]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L3300MTGBTS0K20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:10:40 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 14:12:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37341 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:28:16 -0400 > From: MON KEY > Cc: > > In doc/lispref/searching.texi is the following reference to octal code > `0377' correct? > > ,---- > | You cannot always match all non-@acronym{ASCII} characters with the > | regular expression @code{"[\200-\377]"}. This works when searching a > | unibyte buffer or string (@pxref{Text Representations}), but not in a > | multibyte buffer or string, because many non-@acronym{ASCII} > | characters have codes above octal 0377. {....} > `---- :FILE doc/lispref/searching.texi (info "(elisp)Regexp Special") > > Shouldn't that be: > > "characters have codes above octal #o377" What's the difference between what's written and what you suggest?