From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6539: ispell-complete-word looks for wrong file (at least on w32) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:17:41 +0300 Message-ID: <83vd8zao16.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20100630103826.GA3847@agmartin.aq.upm.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277954981 20547 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2010 03:29:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 03:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6539@debbugs.gnu.org, agustin6martin@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 01 05:29:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUAT5-0001KX-51 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:29:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42084 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUAT4-0007Vx-KX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:29:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52613 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUASx-0007UZ-4k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:29:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUASu-0000Bm-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:29:31 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUASu-0000Bf-Nv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:29:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUAFu-0006vt-D3; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6539.127795415526640 (code B ref 6539); Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2010 03:15:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUAFn-0006vd-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUAFk-0006vY-Nu for 6539@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:15:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L4U00E00ZPAKE00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 6539@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:15:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.12.240]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L4U00E0JZPYD510@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:15:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:16:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38161 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:34:53 +0200 > Cc: 6539@debbugs.gnu.org > > FWIW, I find it really confusing that ispell-complete-word does not > use ispell. It should probably be moved out of ispell.el (unless we > can somehow make it use some ispell/aspell/hunspell functionality). It's there because it's an Ispell feature, present also in the stand-alone version of the speller.