From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9983: valgrind warning in draw_glyphs Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:57:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83vcqwhqnj.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320681633 5159 80.91.229.12 (7 Nov 2011 16:00:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@gnu.org, 9983@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 07 17:00:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRcb-0005vS-6T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:00:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRca-0003R1-No for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:00:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRcS-0003Qk-HO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:00:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRcH-0003vi-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:00:20 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRcH-0003va-O8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRf3-0000xO-Ku for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:03:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9983 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9983-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9983.13206817633655 (code B ref 9983); Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2011 16:02:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRel-0000wu-LE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:02:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNRej-0000wm-7v for 9983@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LUA00E00S6TMS00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9983@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:59:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.70.69]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LUA0088LSEGYA81@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:59:10 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:03:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53662 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 9983@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:21:38 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > The other variables in the line being flagged, `start' and `i', are > > also okay: `start' is one of the call arguments > > Just being an argument does not necessarily make it ok. Indeed. I also thought about that, so I checked the callers two levels up, and came up empty-handed. I guess the optimization done by GCC 4.6 fooled valgrind as well.