From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 'struct window' cleanup #2 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:12:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83vcie80b0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4FE827B6.6020306@yandex.ru> <4FE89369.2000708@gmx.at> <4FE896A9.3090002@yandex.ru> <4FE9643C.1090201@gmx.at> <83a9zq9jhp.fsf@gnu.org> <4FE9E82A.40803@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340730746 22309 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2012 17:12:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 26 19:12:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SjZJR-0000OU-1P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:12:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52915 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjZJQ-0005QL-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjZJO-0005QF-F2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:12:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjZJJ-0006OM-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:44186) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjZJJ-0006Nv-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M6800400IBIIC00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:12:08 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M6800471IG7DX50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:12:08 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4FE9E82A.40803@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151192 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:49:46 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > CC: martin rudalics , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 06/26/2012 07:32 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I don't object. But if we think that Lisp integers cause any > > significant slowdown during GC, we could special-case them in > > mark_object, because that is a no-op for integers. That would be less > > work and less potential bugs. > > Hm... mark_object is an absolute bottleneck now, and, IMHO, > handling one more special case (just one conditional branch) > will make it even worse. Sorry, I meant special-case the integers in mark_vectorlike, which calls mark_object for Lisp integers.