From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109512: Inline functions to examine and change buffer overlays. Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:44:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83vcgtdsg9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5022934F.3050702@yandex.ru> <83wr19dzbj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344458710 31185 80.91.229.3 (8 Aug 2012 20:45:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 20:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 08 22:45:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SzD7r-0003Hq-BK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 22:45:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzD7q-0007f6-Au for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzD7o-0007eb-3x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzD7n-0002X3-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:53776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzD7m-0002VR-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M8G00300EQP8S00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:44:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M8G0021BEYBJVH0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:44:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152352 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:47:58 -0400 > Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > FWIW, the display engine uses this division quite a lot. If we end up > > removing it, I suggest to time the code with and without it, e.g. by > > timing some modes that are heavy users of overlays. > > I don't think we need timings. Not if we aren't getting rid of overlay-recenter, we don't ;-)