From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature" Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 23:19:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83vcewedcq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lig3yaci.fsf@gnu.org> <505CC1FA.4070300@cs.ucla.edu> <874nmglvp4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <83zk48egzb.fsf@gnu.org> <50675F3C.1040801@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348953579 22448 80.91.229.3 (29 Sep 2012 21:19:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 29 23:19:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TI4Rs-00013F-34 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 23:19:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53203 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI4Rm-0004qk-Md for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:19:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI4Rj-0004po-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:19:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI4Rh-0000hl-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:19:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:62132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI4Rh-0000h4-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MB400K00R67YS00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 23:19:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MB400KECR8JY120@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 23:19:31 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <50675F3C.1040801@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153722 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:51:08 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: Juri Linkov > > On 09/29/2012 01:01 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I'd suggest a small research > > It'd be nice to do that, but until someone has the time, > how about if we just bump the handle_fatal_signal > backtrace number from 10 to 24? It sounds like that would > have addressed Juri's problem. A quick look at several backtraces in the tracker indicates that something like 40 will cover most cases.