From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recent changes in doc/misc/ Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:47:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83vcbuozr9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zk16pijp.fsf@gnu.org> <50D5D2E0.4000201@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356191248 28216 80.91.229.3 (22 Dec 2012 15:47:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 22 16:47:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmRIa-0003hF-1W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:47:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34623 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmRIL-0007zY-Tm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:47:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmRIG-0007yY-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:47:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmRIE-0002LU-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:47:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:50590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmRID-0002LK-Ob; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:47:17 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MFF00M00VONOW00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:47:16 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MFF00MKZVURPK00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:47:16 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <50D5D2E0.4000201@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155770 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 07:33:52 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > . why some of the manuals @include gpl.texi, while others include its > > contents instead? > > In the old days gpl.texi contained sectioning commands > and @node, so it wouldn't fit into manuals that wanted to do their > own sectioning, and people would copy the text of gpl.texi > without its sectioning commands. Nowadays that problem has been fixed, > so @include gpl.texi should suffice. > > Hmm, but I just now checked, and I didn't see any Emacs manuals that > contain copies of gpl.texi's contents, so perhaps I'm misunderstanding > your question. Sorry, I was confused. Ignore the second issue, only the first is real.