From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13935: 24.3.50; `fullscreen' frame parameter is wrong, on MS Windows at least Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:48:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83vc8s4vvh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3B679DF7B809403FBE6F1593250D1D1A@us.oracle.com> <83fw00joom.fsf@gnu.org> <837gl95akv.fsf@gnu.org> <834ngd55v6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363355396 10576 80.91.229.3 (15 Mar 2013 13:49:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13935@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 15 14:50:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UGV1R-0000Bn-Uf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:50:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGV15-0004kU-Bs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:49:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGV11-0004jt-JB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:49:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGV0z-0000Ib-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:49:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGV0z-0000IX-C0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGV2D-0005To-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13935.136335540620991 (code B ref 13935); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2013 13:50:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGV1G-0005SF-9m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:46388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGV18-0005Ra-S5 for 13935@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MJP00B00F8M9G00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 13935@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:48:16 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MJP00AQXFOFTQE0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:48:15 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:72541 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 13935@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:07:20 -0400 > > > Yes, I also think it's a pretty confusing and counter-intuitive terminology. > > See also bug#10670 That one talks about the _name_ of the parameter; I was talking about the _values_ (and implicitly also about their reflections in the C code).