From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15029: 24.3; feature-request: add window-focus-lost-hook Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:20:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83vc3eraj3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20130805232148.b0f8363e1c2ab7279f873bee@gmx.com> <71bo58am8s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83txj0t92k.fsf@gnu.org> <8338qjtiva.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376072482 5902 80.91.229.3 (9 Aug 2013 18:21:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 18:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15029@debbugs.gnu.org, dmol@gmx.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 09 20:21:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V7rJN-0000tK-GP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:21:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54571 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7rJM-0005FZ-V7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:21:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49775) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7rJE-0005Dh-3N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7rJ8-0003QB-QD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7rJ8-0003Q5-NC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7rJ8-0006K5-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15029 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15029-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15029.137607242724246 (code B ref 15029); Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15029) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2013 18:20:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50199 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7rIX-0006Iz-Ro for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7rIT-0006IZ-L3 for 15029@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MRA0000006J7700@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 15029@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:20:15 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MRA00NVY09R4R80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:20:15 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:77201 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:54:58 -0400 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: rgm@gnu.org, 15029@debbugs.gnu.org, dmol@gmx.com > > However, the main point is that you're making an argument that it's ok > to create a nasty problem because there are other such nasty problems. No, I'm arguing that the problem is not as nasty as you seem to imply, and that we have dealt with such problems successfully for a long time.