From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default behaviour of RET. Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:47:29 +0300 Message-ID: <83vc0xngku.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20131013101325.GA2621@acm.acm> <20131013140931.GC2621@acm.acm> <20131013172841.GA2498@acm.acm> <525D8946.4070406@gmx.at> <20131016171240.GA3125@acm.acm> <525EDC50.8010401@gmx.at> <20131016192642.GD3125@acm.acm> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381952869 29214 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2013 19:47:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 16 21:47:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VWX4P-00044t-8y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:47:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49111 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWX4O-0001nU-TJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:47:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWX4G-0001e5-17 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWX4B-00039w-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:58013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWX4A-00039g-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:47:34 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MUS000001FA2M00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:47:33 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MUS000EH1N50E50@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:47:33 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <20131016192642.GD3125@acm.acm> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164252 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:26:42 +0000 > From: Alan Mackenzie > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > But there must also be a ready way of doing what RET currently does, > inserting a new line without indenting it. What's wrong with "C-q C-j"?