From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15893: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:10:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83vbzb79aw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ppq3ylub.fsf@gnu.org> <83iovuzyg5.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4a39j33.fsf@gnu.org> <838uw9ajia.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385723535 31748 80.91.229.3 (29 Nov 2013 11:12:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15893-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 29 12:12:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VmLze-0003EC-6M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:12:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46811 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmLzd-0000es-Jc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:12:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmLzV-0000db-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmLzP-0006Te-Cn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmLzP-0006TW-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmLzO-0001kJ-Jq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15893 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 15893-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D15893.13857234706639 (code D ref 15893); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15893-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2013 11:11:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49809 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmLyY-0001j1-IL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:33704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmLyV-0001im-S5 for 15893-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:11:08 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MX000500V0YES00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 15893-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:10:41 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MX00055GV1TDB30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:10:41 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81088 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:27:56 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 15893@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Please try the current trunk, the changes I made in revision 115259 > > might also fix this one. > > For a couple of days, I've used a binary with that changes, and I've > not seen more crashes since then (but the crashes were not > deterministic anyway). > > So perhaps we could close this bug now, and I'll reopen it if I see > the crash again. Done. Thanks.