From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:49:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83vbv64qrc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <532B3FFE.5020403@gmx.at> <83eh1w7gkd.fsf@gnu.org> <532BF25B.2070004@gmx.at> <83siqc54nv.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnwz5xu1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395474555 20878 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2014 07:49:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 07:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, cloos@jhcloos.com, kanru@kanru.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 22 08:49:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRGgD-0004G1-QH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 08:49:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRGgD-0007cl-CX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 03:49:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRGg7-0007cd-57 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 03:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRGg3-0002Pw-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 03:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:44762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRGg2-0002Pq-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 03:49:10 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2T00A00UODPV00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:49:09 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2T00AKEV1XGH60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:49:09 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170770 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, kanru@kanru.info, christian@defun.dk, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:42:54 -0400 > > >> And the portions of the frame made visible by > >> unobscuring/deiconifying will be redrawn in response to the expose > >> events that windowing-system will send us. > > That is only possible if the current matrices of the frame correctly > > reflect what should be on the screen, > > Why wouldn't it? Because we stop updating the matrices of iconified and invisible frames.