From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18205: Obsolete patterns in auto-mode-alist Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 21:04:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83vbq5o5ox.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407348329 2651 80.91.229.3 (6 Aug 2014 18:05:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18205@debbugs.gnu.org To: Reuben Thomas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 06 20:05:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XF5aQ-0001IK-Bp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 20:05:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XF5aP-0004rJ-Lz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XF5aG-0004of-6I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:05:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XF5aA-00005R-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XF5aA-00005J-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XF5aA-0007Sa-Gd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 18:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18205 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18205-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18205.140734826628610 (code B ref 18205); Wed, 06 Aug 2014 18:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2014 18:04:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60685 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XF5Za-0007RM-BG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:04:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:42136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XF5ZX-0007R9-IV for 18205@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N9W00B00CIK9Y00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 18205@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 20:59:27 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N9W007N4CN33Y40@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 20:59:27 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92211 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:47:14 +0100 > From: Reuben Thomas > Cc: 18205@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > s/MSDOG/MS-DOS/ > > > > This used to be used as a joke in Emacs source. Nowadays we should use > > the name of a Free Software instead. > > > > FreeDOS maybe? > > > > That would be confusing (since it's still best known as MS-DOS) and > inconsistent (since Emacs calls it MS-DOS or ms-dos everywhere). Did you search the Emacs tree for MS-DOG?