Re: ispell-buffer skips repetitive suspects after the first is accepted

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Francis Belliveau <f.belliveau@comcast.net>
> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 19:01:06 -0400
> 
> This is clearly an intended feature.  I am personally annoyed by the inability to indicate something suspicious is valid for a particular document.  

This "feature" doesn't do what you want: if the same word happens on
another line, it will be flagged again.  Only words on the same line
are exempt.

> I do not want such things added to my dictionary because they are likely not valid for other documents.

Then why don't you use the 'a' command?  It does exactly what you
want: you won't be asked again about the same word in this "spelling
session", and won't add the word to your personal dictionary.

> That’s my opinion and I am sticking with it:-)

Even after I explained the above?