From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21305: 25.0.50; `get-buffer-window-list' doc - what order? Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:56:42 +0300 Message-ID: <83vbc8iyut.fsf@gnu.org> References: <089f48ed-6ce9-4753-abcf-3f86d43a278e@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440161847 24571 80.91.229.3 (21 Aug 2015 12:57:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21305@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 21 14:57:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSlsj-00036B-E5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:57:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41383 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSlsi-0007Md-FT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:57:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSlsZ-0007F5-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:57:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSlsU-0001Hk-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSlsU-0001Hg-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSlsU-0007dZ-04 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21305 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21305-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21305.144016181329342 (code B ref 21305); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2015 12:56:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34237 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSlsK-0007dA-LG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:40210) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSlsG-0007cx-1l for 21305@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:56:49 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NTF00L00NXT5M00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 21305@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:56:46 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NTF00LKONYL4R20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:56:46 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <089f48ed-6ce9-4753-abcf-3f86d43a278e@default> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:105646 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:49:26 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > > The doc string says: "Windows are scanned starting with the selected > window." What does that mean? Scanned? How so? In what order are > they scanned (besides starting with selected)? And how is the scanning > used? I replaced that sentence with this one: If the selected window displays BUFFER-OR-NAME, it will be the first in the resulting list. Do you see any issues left after that change? (I don't.) > Please update both the doc string and (elisp) `Buffers and Windows' > to tell us what order the list is in. The order is unspecified, which means the caller should not depend on it. I don't think there's anything wrong with that; do you?